From 7c487767f42a70358eea15eb9a86ac673856f905 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:12:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve next_snapshot_is_due().

Currently it's a bit weird how next_snapshot_is_due() decides whether
the next snapshot time has to be (re-)computed:

	On startup, next_snapshot_time is zero as it is declared
	static.

	next_snapshot_is_due() checks whether next_snapshot_time is
	greater than the current time. If yes, then next_snapshot_time
	needs not be updated and the function returns false.

	Otherwise (e.g. if it is called for the first time),
	next_snapshot_time is recomputed, next_snapshot_is_due()
	checks again if it is greater than the current time and
	returns false if it is, true otherwise.

Consequently, dss computes the next snapshot time twice per snapshot.
Moreover, it compares next_snapshot_time twice against the current time
where one comparison would suffice. The code is thus less efficient
and harder to understand than necessary. This patch addresses both
issues. It introduces the two trivial helper functions

	next_snapshot_time_is_valid() and invalidate_next_snapshot_time().

The former function simply tests next_snapshot_time against zero. It
is called from next_snapshot_is_due(). If it returns false, the new
compute_next_snapshot_time() is called (which makes next_snapshot_time
valid). Next, the usual comparison against the current time is
performed.

invalidate_next_snapshot_time() sets next_snapshot_time to zero. It
is called from pre_create_hook() and from handle_sighup(), the latter
call is necessary because changes in the config file might lead to
different snapshot creation times.
---
 dss.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dss.c b/dss.c
index f82664f..04fe30c 100644
--- a/dss.c
+++ b/dss.c
@@ -151,19 +151,16 @@ static void dss_get_snapshot_list(struct snapshot_list *sl)
 	get_snapshot_list(sl, conf.unit_interval_arg, conf.num_intervals_arg);
 }
 
-static int next_snapshot_is_due(void)
+static int64_t compute_next_snapshot_time(void)
 {
 	int64_t x = 0, now = get_current_time(), unit_interval
-		= 24 * 3600 * conf.unit_interval_arg;
+		= 24 * 3600 * conf.unit_interval_arg, ret;
 	unsigned wanted = desired_number_of_snapshots(0, conf.num_intervals_arg),
 		num_complete_snapshots = 0;
-	int i, ret;
+	int i;
 	struct snapshot *s = NULL;
 	struct snapshot_list sl;
 
-	if (next_snapshot_time > now)
-		return 0;
-	assert(snapshot_creation_status == HS_READY);
 	current_snapshot_creation_time = 0;
 	dss_get_snapshot_list(&sl);
 	FOR_EACH_SNAPSHOT(s, i, &sl) {
@@ -174,29 +171,51 @@ static int next_snapshot_is_due(void)
 	}
 	assert(x >= 0);
 
-	next_snapshot_time = now;
+	ret = now;
 	if (num_complete_snapshots == 0)
 		goto out;
 	x /= num_complete_snapshots; /* avg time to create one snapshot */
 	if (unit_interval < x * wanted) /* oops, no sleep at all */
 		goto out;
-	next_snapshot_time = s->completion_time + unit_interval / wanted - x;
+	ret = s->completion_time + unit_interval / wanted - x;
 out:
 	free_snapshot_list(&sl);
-	ret = next_snapshot_time <= now;
-	if (ret == 0)
-		DSS_DEBUG_LOG("next snapshot due in %lu seconds\n",
-			next_snapshot_time - now);
-	else
-		DSS_DEBUG_LOG("next snapshot: now\n");
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline void invalidate_next_snapshot_time(void)
+{
+	next_snapshot_time = 0;
+}
+
+static inline int next_snapshot_time_is_valid(void)
+{
+	return next_snapshot_time != 0;
+}
+
+static int next_snapshot_is_due(void)
+{
+	int64_t now = get_current_time();
+
+	assert(snapshot_creation_status == HS_READY);
+	if (!next_snapshot_time_is_valid())
+		next_snapshot_time = compute_next_snapshot_time();
+	if (next_snapshot_time <= now) {
+		DSS_DEBUG_LOG("next snapshot: now\n");
+		return 1;
+	}
+	DSS_DEBUG_LOG("next snapshot due in %" PRId64 " seconds\n",
+		next_snapshot_time - now);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int pre_create_hook(void)
 {
 	int ret, fds[3] = {0, 0, 0};
 
 	assert(snapshot_creation_status == HS_READY);
+	/* make sure that the next snapshot time will be recomputed */
+	invalidate_next_snapshot_time();
 	if (!conf.pre_create_hook_given) {
 		snapshot_creation_status = HS_PRE_SUCCESS;
 		return 0;
@@ -887,6 +906,7 @@ static int handle_sighup(void)
 	ret = parse_config_file(1);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
+	invalidate_next_snapshot_time();
 	return change_to_dest_dir();
 }
 
-- 
2.39.5